sql-server – 在仅使用文字值的WHERE子句中替换ISNULL()的不同
发布时间:2021-01-10 21:11:22 所属栏目:编程 来源:网络整理
导读:这不是什么: 这不是关于接受用户输入或使用变量的catch-all queries的问题. 这严格来说,在WHERE子句中使用ISNULL()将NULL值替换为canary值以与谓词进行比较,以及在SQL Server中将这些查询重写为SARGable的不同方法. 你为什么不在那边坐? 我们的示例查询针对
Table 'Users'. Scan count 20,logical reads 17564,lob read-ahead reads 0. Table 'Workfile'. Scan count 0,lob read-ahead reads 0. SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 4844 ms,elapsed time = 863 ms. 重写交叉适用于派生连接会产生完全相同的一切.我不打算重新发布查询计划和统计信息 – 它们确实没有改变. SELECT COUNT(u.Id)
FROM dbo.Users AS u
JOIN
(
SELECT u.Id
FROM dbo.Users AS u
WHERE u.Age < 18
UNION ALL
SELECT u.Id
FROM dbo.Users AS u
WHERE u.Age IS NULL
) x ON x.Id = u.Id;
关系代数: 尝试使用INTERSECT SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM dbo.Users AS u
WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT u.Age WHERE u.Age >= 18
INTERSECT
SELECT u.Age WHERE u.Age IS NOT NULL );
Table 'Users'. Scan count 1,lob read-ahead reads 0. SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 1094 ms,elapsed time = 1090 ms. 这是除了以外的尝试 SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM dbo.Users AS u
WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT u.Age WHERE u.Age >= 18
EXCEPT
SELECT u.Age WHERE u.Age IS NULL);
Table 'Users'. Scan count 7,logical reads 9247,lob read-ahead reads 0. SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 2126 ms,elapsed time = 376 ms. 可能还有其他方法来编写这些,但我会把这个留给那些可能比我更常使用EXCEPT和INTERSECT的人. 如果你真的需要一个计数 SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN u.Age < 18 THEN 1
WHEN u.Age IS NULL THEN 1
ELSE 0 END)
FROM dbo.Users AS u
SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN u.Age < 18 OR u.Age IS NULL THEN 1
ELSE 0 END)
FROM dbo.Users AS u
它们都具有相同的计划并具有相同的CPU和读取特性. Table 'Users'. Scan count 1,lob read-ahead reads 0. SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 719 ms,elapsed time = 719 ms. 获胜者,冠军? SELECT SUM(Records)
FROM
(
SELECT 1
FROM dbo.Users AS u
WHERE u.Age < 18
UNION ALL
SELECT 1
FROM dbo.Users AS u
WHERE u.Age IS NULL
) x (Records)
OPTION(QUERYTRACEON 8649);
谢谢! (编辑:晋江门户网) 【声明】本站内容均来自网络,其相关言论仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本站立场。若无意侵犯到您的权利,请及时与联系站长删除相关内容! |


